Tue, Jun 17, 2025
Volume 18, Issue 3 (May-Jun 2024)
mljgoums 2024, 18(3): 16-20 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Kaur K. An overview of the production of AmpC and Metallo-β-Lactamase enzymes in Escherichia coli. mljgoums 2024; 18 (3) :16-20
URL: http://mlj.goums.ac.ir/article-1-1548-en.html
URL: http://mlj.goums.ac.ir/article-1-1548-en.html
Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab, India. , kaurkiran.971997@gmail.com
Keywords: Escherichia Coli, Drug Resistance, Microbial, AmpC Beta-Lactamases, Metallo-Beta-Lactamase
Full-Text [PDF 537 kb]
(470 Downloads)
| Abstract (HTML) (2189 Views)
Full-Text: (568 Views)
Introduction
The expansion of multidrug resistance in pathogenic bacteria has now become a therapeutic challenge in the clinical health industry. Given the wide range of available antibiotics, β-lactams are widely used drugs against Gram-negative bacterial infections, as they exhibit high efficacy, broad-spectrum activity, and low toxicity (1). Penicillin was the first β-lactam antibiotic discovered by Fleming. It acts by binding to penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs), which are transpeptidase enzymes located in the bacterial peptidoglycan layer. This interaction with PBPs is what allows β-lactam antibiotics to induce these enzymes, causing damage to the bacterial cell wall and ultimately resulting in cell death (2).
The most probable cause of bacterial resistance to β-lactam antibiotics is the production of β-lactamase enzymes, which hydrolyze the 3-carbon and 1-nitrogen β-lactam ring (3) in antibiotics (4). The accepted theory regarding the origin of β-lactamase enzymes is a genetic modification in PBPs (2). The high prevalence of hospital-acquired infections among patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) presents a significant clinical challenge. When patients are administered high doses of β-lactam antibiotics, it can lead to the development of resistance in pathogenic bacteria. These bacteria mutate, resulting in various forms of mutated β-lactamases, such as extended-spectrum β-lactamase, AmpC β-lactamase, and metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) (5,1), which are usually resistant to third-generation penicillin, cephalosporin, and carbapenems (4).
Escherichia coli, a rod-shaped, Gram-negative bacterium from the Enterobacteriaceae family, is a type of coliform bacterium, which is a significant contributor to hospital-acquired infections (6). Several modern diagnostic procedures, such as endoscopic examination, catheterization, and intubation for ICU patients result in hospital-acquired infections, such as urinary tract infection (UTI), diarrhea, bacteriemia, neonatal septicemia, and urosepsis. Certain microorganisms, such as E. coli, are part of the normal flora, but can become pathogenic when an individual’s immune response is compromised, thereby heightening the risk of opportunistic infections in hospitalized patients (7).
Phylogenetic analyses categorize E. coli strains into four groups: A, B1, B2, and D. The commensal strains of E. coli are typically found in groups A and B1. On the other hand, pathogenic strains, which are responsible for extraintestinal infections, are classified under groups D and B2. It is important to note that the strains in groups D and B2 are more susceptible to developing antibiotic resistance (8). Resistance to β-lactam antibiotics, which produce AmpC β-lactamase and MBL E. coli, is not only observed in humans. This resistance has been also found in dairy animals, livestock, and street dogs in South Korea. The resistance is linked to genes that are primarily located on integrons, transposons, insertion sequences, and plasmids. Notably, the blaCTX-M-14 gene was identified in 23 isolates of E. coli (9), raising significant concerns in the medical industry (10). This review provides a summary of the operational mechanism and resistance of β-lactam classes against pathogenic Gram-negative bacilli. It also discusses advanced therapeutic options used to combat AmpC β-lactamase and MBL-producing E. coli. Functional and molecular classification of beta lactamases and examples of beta-lactamase enzymes are mentioned in Table 1 and 2 (2, 5, 11-22).
1. Development of resistance to β-lactams (AmpC-β-lactamases and MBLs)
Over the past 50 years, the enzyme β-lactamase has garnered significant attention due to its clinical importance and its role in treatment failure. The first plasmid-mediated β-lactamase of the ESBL type was discovered in E. coli TEM-1 in Europe. Concurrently, a mutated variant was introduced, originating from the wild-type TEM-1 and SHV-1, found in Klebsiella pneumoniae SHV-2 in Germany. This variant has since been widely distributed (2). During this period, ESBLs were primarily associated with hospital outbreaks in the ICU, predominantly due to a specific strain of K. pneumoniae. The emergence of ESBLs in E. coli led to a shift in epidemiological conditions, involving various E. coli clones and diverse genetic elements carrying the blaESBL genes (14). The prevalence of these new enzymes, which have the potential to degrade third-generation cephalosporins, is on the rise in both European and Asian countries (2).
A new chapter unfolded when the plasmid-carrying AmpC cephalosporinases were found to originate from the same chromosomally mediated AmpC enzyme gene. These genes have spread globally within the Enterobacteriaceae family, posing a significant challenge. They inactivate cephamycin and other extended-spectrum cephalosporins, exhibit resistance to clavulanic acid, and contribute to higher morbidity and mortality rates in patients, causing a major concern in healthcare (23). A study reported that the prevalence of AmpC β-lactamases producing E. coli in India varies from 3.3% to 37.5%, depending on the geographical distribution. In other parts of the country, the prevalence of AmpC producing E. coli is reported as 6.97% in North India and 47.8% in the Eastern region. In the Southern part of the country, the prevalence is 3.3% in Karnataka and 9.2% in Chennai. This highlights the significant regional variation in the prevalence of this enzyme (24).
In 1991, Japan reported the discovery of the first Ambler class B imipenemase (IMP)-type MBL. The VIM type, on the other hand, originated in European countries (25). A survey conducted at the Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge in Barcelona, Spain, from 1996 to 2001, reported the first major outbreak of MBL blaVIM-2-producing P. aeruginosa. This strain was found to be resistant to all β-lactams and fluoroquinolones, marking a significant event in the study of antibiotic resistance (24,25). Another study conducted at the Alfred Hospital from January to July 2004 reported an outbreak in Australia. There were 19 isolates, including 10 isolates of S. marcescens, four isolates of K. pneumonia, three isolates of P. aeruginosa, one isolate from E. cloacae, and one isolate from E. coli producing the blaIMP-4 gene (25,26). In 2003, Miriagou et al. reported the first instance of a self-transferable encoded plasmid VIM-1 MBL produced by the E. coli V541 strain. This strain was isolated from a patient’s urine sample at Tzanion General Hospital in Piraeus, Greece, in November 2001 (27,28).
Lincopan et al. (2005) reported the first blaIMP-1 MBL carrying class 1 integron-producing K. pneumoniae in a 75-year-old patient in Brazil (29). A case study conducted by Tewari et al. reported a high prevalence of AmpC (34%) in E. coli strains that were resistant to cefoxitin (59%) and cefotetan (69%). Additionally, they found a 27% prevalence of carbapenem resistance in E. coli, with 29% resistance to imipenem and 31% to meropenem. These findings were reported at a hospital in South Bangalore, India (30). The rapid spread of bacterial resistance, mediated by these β-lactamases, is expanding swiftly in many countries with limited resources and few treatment options. This situation significantly complicates healthcare conditions. The excessive use of antibiotics plays a crucial role in the development and spread of resistance to third-generation cephalosporins and carbapenems. This resistance is escalating globally (Including India), not only in E. coli, but also in other members of the Enterobacteriaceae family (30).
3. Interaction of β-lactams with Gram-negative bacteria
For nearly seven decades, β-lactam antibiotics have been the keystone of human health (31). The advent of antibiotics in the 1930’s significantly transformed the fight against infectious bacterial diseases (3). In the history of clinical medicine, β-lactams have provided extensive benefits through a process of continuous innovation. The most evident manifestation of this is the evolution of the internal structure of β-lactam subclasses. This evolution influences the ability of bacteria to develop innovative resistance mechanisms against each successive generation of β-lactams (31). The β-lactam antibiotics share a common fundamental structure known as the β-lactam ring. This ring is an integral part of the chemical structure of various β-lactam antibiotic families. It is a heterocyclic ring, formed by the cyclic amide group, which consists of three carbon atoms and one nitrogen atom. The classification of β-lactams is based on the presence or absence of this central ring structure (32). The β-lactam family was initially characterized as including penicillin-sulfur-containing penams, cephalosporin-sulfur-containing cephems, and monocyclic β-lactams, such as carbapenems, oxapenems, carbacephems, and oxacephems. The β-lactams are among the most significant classes of antibiotics, alongside macrolides and fluoroquinolones (13).
Penicillin is characterized by a bicyclic core structure, which is a nucleus of 6-aminopenicillanic acid. This nucleus is formed by the condensation of L-cysteine and D-valine and consists of a β-lactam ring and a five-membered thiazolidine ring. The modification of penicillin takes place in the acyl side chain that is attached to the C6 carbon atom. The penicillin class includes natural penicillins, such as benzylpenicillin, penicillin G, phenoxymethylpenicillin, and penicillin V. It also includes extended-spectrum penicillins, such as ampicillin (Aminopenicillin) and ticarcillin (Carboxypenicillin) (3,30,31).
Cephalosporins are composed of a 7-aminocephalosporanic acid nucleus, which is coupled with 3,6-dihydro-2H-1,3-thiazine side chains (3). They are derived from the fermentation products of the fungus Acremonium chrysogenum. These antibiotics are categorized into five generations, each with different properties and uses. The first generation includes cephalothin, cefapirin, cefazolin, cefalexin, cefradine, and cefadroxil. The second generation comprises cefamandole, cefuroxime, cefonicid, and ceforanide. The third generation consists of cefotaxime, ceftizoxime, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, cefoperazone, cefixime, ceftibuten, and cefdinir. The fourth generation includes cefpirome and cefepime, and the fifth generation encompasses ceftobiprole and ceftaroline (32).
Carbapenems represent the broadest-spectrum antibiotics among β-lactam drugs. They are characterized by a carbon atom, which replaces the sulfur atom on the five-membered ring attached to the β-lactam ring. Additionally, they have a hydroxyethyl side chain at the 6th position, which enhances their stability against β-lactamases. Due to their compact structure and size, these antibiotics can easily penetrate the cell membrane of Gram-negative bacteria. The first carbapenem, thienamycin, was produced by the bacterium Streptomyces cattleya. Imipenem, a chemically modified version, features a hydroxymethyl side chain, which is a departure from the classical acylamino side chain in penicillins and cephalosporins. The carbapenems that are commonly used worldwide include doripenem, ertapenem, imipenem, meropenem, and biapenem. Tebipenem, another type of carbapenem, is only available in Japan (30-32).
Four factors are involved in the antimicrobial activity of β-lactam antibiotics: (i) the concentration of the antibiotic, (ii) antibiotic diffusion through the outer cell membrane, (iii) the ability to resist the attack by inactivating enzymes, and (iv) the affinity of the antibiotic for the target enzyme. The β-lactams exhibit bactericidal activities by inhibiting the synthesis of the bacterial cell wall (33,34). Peptidoglycans and murein are the basic constituents of bacterial cell membrane stability. The structure is composed of alternating residues of β-1,4-linked N-acetylglucosamine (GluNAc) and N-acetylmuramic acid (MurNAc). This forms a heteropolymer, which consists of glycan chains that are cross-linked by short peptides. In Gram-negative bacteria, the carboxyl-terminal of each MurNAc residue is substituted with a pentapeptide subunit (C-1 to C-6). This subunit contains alternating L- and D-amino acids, along with one dibasic amino acid, typically meso-diaminopimelic acid (m-DAP) (30,32).
Lipid II, a biosynthetic building block, is another compound that stabilizes the polymeric structure of the cell wall. It is synthesized within the cell’s cytoplasm and is located on the inner surface of the cytoplasmic membrane. The enzymatic reaction involved in this process is dependent on penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs). These PBPs are composed of four structural domains. The first domain is an amphipathic polypeptide sequence that gathers these enzymes to the outer surface of the plasma membrane in conjunction with lipid II. The second domain is a glycosyltransferase, also known as the catalyst domain. In this domain, lipid II is transferred to a new glycan chain. Simultaneously, undecaprenyl diphosphate is released as the leaving group. This complex process plays a crucial role in bacterial cell wall synthesis and stability.
The primary function of the third domain is to separate the second and fourth domains, both of which exhibit transpeptidase activity. The fourth domain serves as the molecular target for β-lactams. The final step in the assembly process of the plasma membrane involves the transpeptidation of adjoining glycan strands. This process uses m-DAP (Amine terminus) as the acyl-acceptor of one glycan, while releasing the D-Ala terminus of the second glycan. This cross-linked transpeptidase domain is the primary target site of β-lactam antibiotics. The β-lactams employ a mechanism of functional mimicry by modifying the acylation of the active site domain of PBPs. This mimics the D-Ala-D-Ala terminus (The core structure of transpeptidase) with the intrinsic acylation reactivity of its β-lactam structure. This mechanism is known as the Tipper-Strominger hypothesis, proposed by Strominger (31). By inhibiting the transpeptidase reaction, the structural integrity of the bacterial plasma membrane is compromised, leading to cell death or cell lysis. This mechanism is a crucial aspect of the action of certain antibiotics.
4. Mechanism of AmpC and MBL β-lactamase resistance in E. coli
The β-lactamase interferes with the β-lactam action by hydrolyzing the amide bond of the four-membered β-lactam ring (35,36). The structure of class C β-lactamase is a key aspect of β-lactamase classification. The active-site residues associated with the hydrogen-bonding network include Ser64, Lys67, Gln120, and Tyr150. These residues play a crucial role in the function and interaction of the enzyme with β-lactam antibiotics (18). The Tyr150 residue activates the acylation of Ser64 by serving as a proton acceptor for the hydrogen atom of Ser64. This action, in turn, triggers a nucleophilic attack on the carbonyl carbon atom of the β-lactam ring. Consequently, after accepting a proton from Ser64 during the formation of the tetrahedral intermediate, the Tyr150 residue returns the proton to the β-lactam nitrogen molecule, leading to the release of the tetrahedral intermediate. Subsequently, the same Tyr150 residue stimulates water molecules to facilitate the deacylation of the acyl-enzyme, thereby concluding the hydrolysis. This process results in the splitting of the β-lactam ring and the release of β-lactamase (12,13,34).
In the absence of inducers, AmpC β-lactamases typically exist in an inhibited state, but their expression is strongly induced in the presence of inhibitors. Normally, without an inducer, MurNAc tri- and tetrapeptide peptidoglycan degradation products are transported into the cytoplasm through the permease AmpG. These products are then separated into dehydro-monosaccharide peptides by the β-N-acetyl-glucosamidase NagZ. Subsequently, these tri- and tetrapeptides are separated from saccharide residues through the action of the N-acetyl-dehydromuramyl-L-alanine amidase AmpD. The peptides formed through this pathway are incorporated into the peptidoglycan synthesis process to form UDP-MurNAc pentapeptides. These pentapeptides are then transported to the periplasm and incorporated into the peptidoglycan layer, completing the normal recycling step.
In the absence of an inducer, the UDP-MurNAc pentapeptide binds to the AmpC transcriptional regulator AmpR, which acts as a repressor and inhibits the expression of the ampC gene (35,36). In the presence of an inducer, such as a β-lactam, the degraded peptidoglycan product accumulates and increases the muropeptide levels, which are then released into the periplasmic space. These muropeptides enter the cytoplasm through an AmpG transporter, where they compete with UDP-MurNAc for the binding site on AmpR. Changes in the UDP-MurNAc signals lead to alterations in AmpR, which in turn activate the hyperproduction of AmpC. Consequently, mutations (Specifically point mutations) in AmpD and AmpR are responsible for the production of AmpC β-lactamases (Figure 1) (23,35,36).
It is known that E. coli mediates resistance to broad-spectrum cephalosporins through the action of AmpC β-lactamases. This is achieved by generating a more dynamic promoter structure, leading to the high production of the endogenous E. coli AmpC gen. Additionally, E. coli can acquire plasmid-derived AmpC genes from other species, further enhancing its resistance capabilities (14). In clinically isolated E. coli, the AmpC cephalosporinase gene, which is located on the chromosome, cannot be induced due to the absence of the AmpR regulator gene. As a result, the expression of the AmpC gene in E. coli depends on the strength of the AmpC promoter. Typically, E. coli AmpC promoters contain two hexamers of conserved sequences in the -35 (TTGACA) and -10 (TATAAT) regions, also known as the Pribnow box, which plays a crucial role in gene transcription. Mutations at positions -10 and -35 in the AmpC promoter boxes, a mutation at -42 in the AmpC promoter linked with a mutation at the -18 sequence, and a mutation in the -11C to T transition can lead to the development of new alternative promoter boxes. These mutations can lead to high expression levels of the chromosomal E. coli AmpC gene, which mediates resistance to cephalosporins (17,37,38).
Commonly, in E. coli, the AmpC promoter, which is typically strong, has undergone mutations at the -88, -82, -42, -18, -1, and +58 positions within its conserved sequences (39-41). AmpC genes, which are derived from plasmids, are found on plasmids ranging in size from 7 kb to 180 kb. While some of these plasmids are not capable of self-transmission, they can still transfer genes through processes, such as transformation and mobilization. In E. coli, resistance to cephalosporins is mediated by the low expression of the AmpC gene. This involves the mutation of AmpC variants, such as CMY, FOX, LAT, E. coli K12, DHA, and ACC. Presently, the CMY and DHA AmpC genes are frequently observed in E. coli (17,24).
Class B metallo-enzymes possess two binding sites for divalent Zn ions. The amide bond in the β-lactam ring is split through a nucleophilic attack on the carbonyl carbon atom of the β-lactam ring by the activated hydroxide Zn-1. This leads to the formation of an enzyme-substrate intermediate. The oxyanion, formed on the carbonyl oxygen of β-lactam, is stabilized by the Asn233 residue and Zn-1. Concurrently, Zn-2 interacts with the lone pair electron of the nitrogen atom of the β-lactam. The Asp120 residue accepts a proton from the activated water molecule within the enzyme and then transfers this proton to the nitrogen atom of an open β-lactam ring. This results in the release of the hydrolyzed substrate and the regeneration of the β-lactamase enzyme (12,35).
The MBLs of subclasses B1 and B3 have two binding sites for Zn ions (42). In the B1 subclass, the Zn-1 ion forms a tetrahedral coordination sphere that includes His116, His118, His196, and a water molecule. This water molecule also serves as a ligand for both Zn ions. The two binding sites are occupied by histidine and cystine. In the B1 enzyme, which includes BcII, VIM-2, and SPM-1, metal ions are found in the histidine binding site (43). In the B3 subclass, the Cys221 found at the Zn-2 site in the B1 subclass is replaced with a His ligand (42). Additionally, Zn-2 is ligated by Asp120, His121, His263, and nucleophilic water molecules, which form a bridge between the two Zn ions.
The GOB enzyme of the B3 subclass differs from other B3 enzymes due to point mutations that occur far from active sites, specifically Leu94Phe, Ala137Val, and Asp282Asn. Both B1 and B3 enzymes exhibit maximal activity when interacting with divalent Zn ion species. B2 enzymes, on the other hand, are non-competitively inhibited after binding to the Zn-2 ion, as histidine does not serve as the second metal-binding site. In the case of the B2 enzyme ImiS, the Zn-2 ion actively binds to the sulfur ligand formed from Met164 and His118. Cys221 is the only ligand of Zn-1, and a mutation of Met146 to Ile prevents inhibition by zinc. Other mutations in CphA residues do not interact with the Zn-2 ligand, as His118 and Met146 bind poorly to the same Zn ion (42-44). These conserved residues do not directly participate in catalysis. However, they play a crucial role in recognizing the substrate and maintaining the structure. Additionally, they actively engage in binding to Zn sites (45). The data suggests that the substitution of amino acid residues in CcrA, IMP-1, BcII, VIM-2, BlaB, and enzymes of the B3 subclass leads to the development of a mutation that confers resistance to carbapenems.
5. Clinical therapy and future approaches to curb the third and fourth generation β-lactam antibiotic resistance
Treatment of invasive bacterial infections is challenging, as most new drugs are not available in some countries and regions (46). Generally, strains that produce AmpC are resistant to multiple drugs, which complicates the selection of effective antimicrobial drugs. The combination of β-lactam and β-lactamase inhibitors, along with most cephalosporins and penicillin, should be avoided due to in vitro resistance. Carbapenems are the preferred drug for AmpC producers. A study conducted on a guinea pig model of pneumonia found that cefepime, imipenem, and meropenem are equally effective against porin-deficient FOX-5-producing K. pneumoniae strains. In a rat pneumonia model, β-lactams, such as imipenem, meropenem, ertapenem, or cefepime, yielded the same results against ACT-1 producing K. pneumoniae strains as they did in the guinea pig model. However, in a mouse model of pneumonia, cefepime showed superior results against K. pneumoniae strains (CMY-2) with porin deficiency. As a result, cefepime has been successful in treating infections caused by Enterobacter spp., including those with reduced susceptibility to ceftazidime (20).
In addition to the previously mentioned drugs, there are other classical and newer drugs that are active against AmpC producers in vitro. These include cephamycin and temocillin, which is a 6-α-methoxy derivative of ticarcillin. Other effective drugs include aminoglycosides, tigecycline, fosfomycin, and fluoroquinolones. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole is also used in the treatment of these infections. These drugs provide additional options for combating resistant bacterial strains (23). Additionally, amdinocillin, when combined with clavulanic acid, has been found to be effective against E. coli strains that produce AmpC in vitro (20). Gutmann et al. reported a new derivative of penicillinate YTR 830 that shows a similar spectrum activity as clavulanic acid combined with amoxicillin against Enterobacteriaceae (47). The MBL inhibitors, such as polymyxins, colistin, tigecycline, and fosfomycin, are effective against carbapenem-resistant E. coli and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infections in vitro. On the other hand, aminoglycosides, including gentamicin, amikacin, and tobramycin, exhibit a different spectrum of activity in vitro (47-49).
The Food and Drug Adminsitraton (FDA)-approved combination drug therapy, also known as fixed-dose combination therapy, is a novel approach aimed at curbing future bacterial resistance. Given the limited options for treating multi-drug resistant bacterial infections, combination therapy offers the best prospect for new drug discovery. The combination of antibiotics with non-antibiotic adjuvants and enhancers presents a promising and effective avenue for antibiotic discovery and development. In an era where the discovery and development of new antibiotics are at a historical low, revitalizing our existing drugs provides a fresh approach to prolonging the lifespan of our clinically approved drugs. Some FDA-approved combination therapies include Recarbrio (A combination of imipenem, cilastatin, and relebactam), Zerbaxa (Ceftolozane-tazobactam), and Avycaz (Ceftazidime-avibactam), all of which have proven effective in treating UTI. In situations where the infectious microorganisms are unknown and rapid treatment is urgently needed, the use of an appropriate dose of combined antibiotics is considered the best practice in the medical industry (50).
Conclusion
The accurate detection of AmpC and MBL production is critical in both hospital and community isolates. These strains are more prevalent than currently recognized strains and pose a significant threat to the efficacy of available beta-lactam drugs. The potential for outbreaks exists due to the selection pressure exerted by the extensive use of cephalosporins and carbapenem. Early identification of AmpC and MBL can aid in the establishment of a hospital-acquired infection control committee. This committee can guide physicians in prescribing the most suitable medications, such as FDA-approved combination drug therapy. This approach is one way to combat the growing resistance to antibacterial drugs. When the infectious microorganisms are unknown and immediate treatment is required, the use of an appropriate dose of combined antibiotics is a promising strategy in the medical industry.
Acknowledgement
This study did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Funding sources
No funding was granted for this study.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Author contributions
This article has one author.
The expansion of multidrug resistance in pathogenic bacteria has now become a therapeutic challenge in the clinical health industry. Given the wide range of available antibiotics, β-lactams are widely used drugs against Gram-negative bacterial infections, as they exhibit high efficacy, broad-spectrum activity, and low toxicity (1). Penicillin was the first β-lactam antibiotic discovered by Fleming. It acts by binding to penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs), which are transpeptidase enzymes located in the bacterial peptidoglycan layer. This interaction with PBPs is what allows β-lactam antibiotics to induce these enzymes, causing damage to the bacterial cell wall and ultimately resulting in cell death (2).
The most probable cause of bacterial resistance to β-lactam antibiotics is the production of β-lactamase enzymes, which hydrolyze the 3-carbon and 1-nitrogen β-lactam ring (3) in antibiotics (4). The accepted theory regarding the origin of β-lactamase enzymes is a genetic modification in PBPs (2). The high prevalence of hospital-acquired infections among patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) presents a significant clinical challenge. When patients are administered high doses of β-lactam antibiotics, it can lead to the development of resistance in pathogenic bacteria. These bacteria mutate, resulting in various forms of mutated β-lactamases, such as extended-spectrum β-lactamase, AmpC β-lactamase, and metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) (5,1), which are usually resistant to third-generation penicillin, cephalosporin, and carbapenems (4).
Escherichia coli, a rod-shaped, Gram-negative bacterium from the Enterobacteriaceae family, is a type of coliform bacterium, which is a significant contributor to hospital-acquired infections (6). Several modern diagnostic procedures, such as endoscopic examination, catheterization, and intubation for ICU patients result in hospital-acquired infections, such as urinary tract infection (UTI), diarrhea, bacteriemia, neonatal septicemia, and urosepsis. Certain microorganisms, such as E. coli, are part of the normal flora, but can become pathogenic when an individual’s immune response is compromised, thereby heightening the risk of opportunistic infections in hospitalized patients (7).
Phylogenetic analyses categorize E. coli strains into four groups: A, B1, B2, and D. The commensal strains of E. coli are typically found in groups A and B1. On the other hand, pathogenic strains, which are responsible for extraintestinal infections, are classified under groups D and B2. It is important to note that the strains in groups D and B2 are more susceptible to developing antibiotic resistance (8). Resistance to β-lactam antibiotics, which produce AmpC β-lactamase and MBL E. coli, is not only observed in humans. This resistance has been also found in dairy animals, livestock, and street dogs in South Korea. The resistance is linked to genes that are primarily located on integrons, transposons, insertion sequences, and plasmids. Notably, the blaCTX-M-14 gene was identified in 23 isolates of E. coli (9), raising significant concerns in the medical industry (10). This review provides a summary of the operational mechanism and resistance of β-lactam classes against pathogenic Gram-negative bacilli. It also discusses advanced therapeutic options used to combat AmpC β-lactamase and MBL-producing E. coli. Functional and molecular classification of beta lactamases and examples of beta-lactamase enzymes are mentioned in Table 1 and 2 (2, 5, 11-22).
1. Development of resistance to β-lactams (AmpC-β-lactamases and MBLs)
Over the past 50 years, the enzyme β-lactamase has garnered significant attention due to its clinical importance and its role in treatment failure. The first plasmid-mediated β-lactamase of the ESBL type was discovered in E. coli TEM-1 in Europe. Concurrently, a mutated variant was introduced, originating from the wild-type TEM-1 and SHV-1, found in Klebsiella pneumoniae SHV-2 in Germany. This variant has since been widely distributed (2). During this period, ESBLs were primarily associated with hospital outbreaks in the ICU, predominantly due to a specific strain of K. pneumoniae. The emergence of ESBLs in E. coli led to a shift in epidemiological conditions, involving various E. coli clones and diverse genetic elements carrying the blaESBL genes (14). The prevalence of these new enzymes, which have the potential to degrade third-generation cephalosporins, is on the rise in both European and Asian countries (2).
A new chapter unfolded when the plasmid-carrying AmpC cephalosporinases were found to originate from the same chromosomally mediated AmpC enzyme gene. These genes have spread globally within the Enterobacteriaceae family, posing a significant challenge. They inactivate cephamycin and other extended-spectrum cephalosporins, exhibit resistance to clavulanic acid, and contribute to higher morbidity and mortality rates in patients, causing a major concern in healthcare (23). A study reported that the prevalence of AmpC β-lactamases producing E. coli in India varies from 3.3% to 37.5%, depending on the geographical distribution. In other parts of the country, the prevalence of AmpC producing E. coli is reported as 6.97% in North India and 47.8% in the Eastern region. In the Southern part of the country, the prevalence is 3.3% in Karnataka and 9.2% in Chennai. This highlights the significant regional variation in the prevalence of this enzyme (24).
In 1991, Japan reported the discovery of the first Ambler class B imipenemase (IMP)-type MBL. The VIM type, on the other hand, originated in European countries (25). A survey conducted at the Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge in Barcelona, Spain, from 1996 to 2001, reported the first major outbreak of MBL blaVIM-2-producing P. aeruginosa. This strain was found to be resistant to all β-lactams and fluoroquinolones, marking a significant event in the study of antibiotic resistance (24,25). Another study conducted at the Alfred Hospital from January to July 2004 reported an outbreak in Australia. There were 19 isolates, including 10 isolates of S. marcescens, four isolates of K. pneumonia, three isolates of P. aeruginosa, one isolate from E. cloacae, and one isolate from E. coli producing the blaIMP-4 gene (25,26). In 2003, Miriagou et al. reported the first instance of a self-transferable encoded plasmid VIM-1 MBL produced by the E. coli V541 strain. This strain was isolated from a patient’s urine sample at Tzanion General Hospital in Piraeus, Greece, in November 2001 (27,28).
Lincopan et al. (2005) reported the first blaIMP-1 MBL carrying class 1 integron-producing K. pneumoniae in a 75-year-old patient in Brazil (29). A case study conducted by Tewari et al. reported a high prevalence of AmpC (34%) in E. coli strains that were resistant to cefoxitin (59%) and cefotetan (69%). Additionally, they found a 27% prevalence of carbapenem resistance in E. coli, with 29% resistance to imipenem and 31% to meropenem. These findings were reported at a hospital in South Bangalore, India (30). The rapid spread of bacterial resistance, mediated by these β-lactamases, is expanding swiftly in many countries with limited resources and few treatment options. This situation significantly complicates healthcare conditions. The excessive use of antibiotics plays a crucial role in the development and spread of resistance to third-generation cephalosporins and carbapenems. This resistance is escalating globally (Including India), not only in E. coli, but also in other members of the Enterobacteriaceae family (30).
For nearly seven decades, β-lactam antibiotics have been the keystone of human health (31). The advent of antibiotics in the 1930’s significantly transformed the fight against infectious bacterial diseases (3). In the history of clinical medicine, β-lactams have provided extensive benefits through a process of continuous innovation. The most evident manifestation of this is the evolution of the internal structure of β-lactam subclasses. This evolution influences the ability of bacteria to develop innovative resistance mechanisms against each successive generation of β-lactams (31). The β-lactam antibiotics share a common fundamental structure known as the β-lactam ring. This ring is an integral part of the chemical structure of various β-lactam antibiotic families. It is a heterocyclic ring, formed by the cyclic amide group, which consists of three carbon atoms and one nitrogen atom. The classification of β-lactams is based on the presence or absence of this central ring structure (32). The β-lactam family was initially characterized as including penicillin-sulfur-containing penams, cephalosporin-sulfur-containing cephems, and monocyclic β-lactams, such as carbapenems, oxapenems, carbacephems, and oxacephems. The β-lactams are among the most significant classes of antibiotics, alongside macrolides and fluoroquinolones (13).
Penicillin is characterized by a bicyclic core structure, which is a nucleus of 6-aminopenicillanic acid. This nucleus is formed by the condensation of L-cysteine and D-valine and consists of a β-lactam ring and a five-membered thiazolidine ring. The modification of penicillin takes place in the acyl side chain that is attached to the C6 carbon atom. The penicillin class includes natural penicillins, such as benzylpenicillin, penicillin G, phenoxymethylpenicillin, and penicillin V. It also includes extended-spectrum penicillins, such as ampicillin (Aminopenicillin) and ticarcillin (Carboxypenicillin) (3,30,31).
Cephalosporins are composed of a 7-aminocephalosporanic acid nucleus, which is coupled with 3,6-dihydro-2H-1,3-thiazine side chains (3). They are derived from the fermentation products of the fungus Acremonium chrysogenum. These antibiotics are categorized into five generations, each with different properties and uses. The first generation includes cephalothin, cefapirin, cefazolin, cefalexin, cefradine, and cefadroxil. The second generation comprises cefamandole, cefuroxime, cefonicid, and ceforanide. The third generation consists of cefotaxime, ceftizoxime, ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, cefoperazone, cefixime, ceftibuten, and cefdinir. The fourth generation includes cefpirome and cefepime, and the fifth generation encompasses ceftobiprole and ceftaroline (32).
Carbapenems represent the broadest-spectrum antibiotics among β-lactam drugs. They are characterized by a carbon atom, which replaces the sulfur atom on the five-membered ring attached to the β-lactam ring. Additionally, they have a hydroxyethyl side chain at the 6th position, which enhances their stability against β-lactamases. Due to their compact structure and size, these antibiotics can easily penetrate the cell membrane of Gram-negative bacteria. The first carbapenem, thienamycin, was produced by the bacterium Streptomyces cattleya. Imipenem, a chemically modified version, features a hydroxymethyl side chain, which is a departure from the classical acylamino side chain in penicillins and cephalosporins. The carbapenems that are commonly used worldwide include doripenem, ertapenem, imipenem, meropenem, and biapenem. Tebipenem, another type of carbapenem, is only available in Japan (30-32).
Four factors are involved in the antimicrobial activity of β-lactam antibiotics: (i) the concentration of the antibiotic, (ii) antibiotic diffusion through the outer cell membrane, (iii) the ability to resist the attack by inactivating enzymes, and (iv) the affinity of the antibiotic for the target enzyme. The β-lactams exhibit bactericidal activities by inhibiting the synthesis of the bacterial cell wall (33,34). Peptidoglycans and murein are the basic constituents of bacterial cell membrane stability. The structure is composed of alternating residues of β-1,4-linked N-acetylglucosamine (GluNAc) and N-acetylmuramic acid (MurNAc). This forms a heteropolymer, which consists of glycan chains that are cross-linked by short peptides. In Gram-negative bacteria, the carboxyl-terminal of each MurNAc residue is substituted with a pentapeptide subunit (C-1 to C-6). This subunit contains alternating L- and D-amino acids, along with one dibasic amino acid, typically meso-diaminopimelic acid (m-DAP) (30,32).
Lipid II, a biosynthetic building block, is another compound that stabilizes the polymeric structure of the cell wall. It is synthesized within the cell’s cytoplasm and is located on the inner surface of the cytoplasmic membrane. The enzymatic reaction involved in this process is dependent on penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs). These PBPs are composed of four structural domains. The first domain is an amphipathic polypeptide sequence that gathers these enzymes to the outer surface of the plasma membrane in conjunction with lipid II. The second domain is a glycosyltransferase, also known as the catalyst domain. In this domain, lipid II is transferred to a new glycan chain. Simultaneously, undecaprenyl diphosphate is released as the leaving group. This complex process plays a crucial role in bacterial cell wall synthesis and stability.
The primary function of the third domain is to separate the second and fourth domains, both of which exhibit transpeptidase activity. The fourth domain serves as the molecular target for β-lactams. The final step in the assembly process of the plasma membrane involves the transpeptidation of adjoining glycan strands. This process uses m-DAP (Amine terminus) as the acyl-acceptor of one glycan, while releasing the D-Ala terminus of the second glycan. This cross-linked transpeptidase domain is the primary target site of β-lactam antibiotics. The β-lactams employ a mechanism of functional mimicry by modifying the acylation of the active site domain of PBPs. This mimics the D-Ala-D-Ala terminus (The core structure of transpeptidase) with the intrinsic acylation reactivity of its β-lactam structure. This mechanism is known as the Tipper-Strominger hypothesis, proposed by Strominger (31). By inhibiting the transpeptidase reaction, the structural integrity of the bacterial plasma membrane is compromised, leading to cell death or cell lysis. This mechanism is a crucial aspect of the action of certain antibiotics.
4. Mechanism of AmpC and MBL β-lactamase resistance in E. coli
The β-lactamase interferes with the β-lactam action by hydrolyzing the amide bond of the four-membered β-lactam ring (35,36). The structure of class C β-lactamase is a key aspect of β-lactamase classification. The active-site residues associated with the hydrogen-bonding network include Ser64, Lys67, Gln120, and Tyr150. These residues play a crucial role in the function and interaction of the enzyme with β-lactam antibiotics (18). The Tyr150 residue activates the acylation of Ser64 by serving as a proton acceptor for the hydrogen atom of Ser64. This action, in turn, triggers a nucleophilic attack on the carbonyl carbon atom of the β-lactam ring. Consequently, after accepting a proton from Ser64 during the formation of the tetrahedral intermediate, the Tyr150 residue returns the proton to the β-lactam nitrogen molecule, leading to the release of the tetrahedral intermediate. Subsequently, the same Tyr150 residue stimulates water molecules to facilitate the deacylation of the acyl-enzyme, thereby concluding the hydrolysis. This process results in the splitting of the β-lactam ring and the release of β-lactamase (12,13,34).
In the absence of inducers, AmpC β-lactamases typically exist in an inhibited state, but their expression is strongly induced in the presence of inhibitors. Normally, without an inducer, MurNAc tri- and tetrapeptide peptidoglycan degradation products are transported into the cytoplasm through the permease AmpG. These products are then separated into dehydro-monosaccharide peptides by the β-N-acetyl-glucosamidase NagZ. Subsequently, these tri- and tetrapeptides are separated from saccharide residues through the action of the N-acetyl-dehydromuramyl-L-alanine amidase AmpD. The peptides formed through this pathway are incorporated into the peptidoglycan synthesis process to form UDP-MurNAc pentapeptides. These pentapeptides are then transported to the periplasm and incorporated into the peptidoglycan layer, completing the normal recycling step.
In the absence of an inducer, the UDP-MurNAc pentapeptide binds to the AmpC transcriptional regulator AmpR, which acts as a repressor and inhibits the expression of the ampC gene (35,36). In the presence of an inducer, such as a β-lactam, the degraded peptidoglycan product accumulates and increases the muropeptide levels, which are then released into the periplasmic space. These muropeptides enter the cytoplasm through an AmpG transporter, where they compete with UDP-MurNAc for the binding site on AmpR. Changes in the UDP-MurNAc signals lead to alterations in AmpR, which in turn activate the hyperproduction of AmpC. Consequently, mutations (Specifically point mutations) in AmpD and AmpR are responsible for the production of AmpC β-lactamases (Figure 1) (23,35,36).
It is known that E. coli mediates resistance to broad-spectrum cephalosporins through the action of AmpC β-lactamases. This is achieved by generating a more dynamic promoter structure, leading to the high production of the endogenous E. coli AmpC gen. Additionally, E. coli can acquire plasmid-derived AmpC genes from other species, further enhancing its resistance capabilities (14). In clinically isolated E. coli, the AmpC cephalosporinase gene, which is located on the chromosome, cannot be induced due to the absence of the AmpR regulator gene. As a result, the expression of the AmpC gene in E. coli depends on the strength of the AmpC promoter. Typically, E. coli AmpC promoters contain two hexamers of conserved sequences in the -35 (TTGACA) and -10 (TATAAT) regions, also known as the Pribnow box, which plays a crucial role in gene transcription. Mutations at positions -10 and -35 in the AmpC promoter boxes, a mutation at -42 in the AmpC promoter linked with a mutation at the -18 sequence, and a mutation in the -11C to T transition can lead to the development of new alternative promoter boxes. These mutations can lead to high expression levels of the chromosomal E. coli AmpC gene, which mediates resistance to cephalosporins (17,37,38).
Commonly, in E. coli, the AmpC promoter, which is typically strong, has undergone mutations at the -88, -82, -42, -18, -1, and +58 positions within its conserved sequences (39-41). AmpC genes, which are derived from plasmids, are found on plasmids ranging in size from 7 kb to 180 kb. While some of these plasmids are not capable of self-transmission, they can still transfer genes through processes, such as transformation and mobilization. In E. coli, resistance to cephalosporins is mediated by the low expression of the AmpC gene. This involves the mutation of AmpC variants, such as CMY, FOX, LAT, E. coli K12, DHA, and ACC. Presently, the CMY and DHA AmpC genes are frequently observed in E. coli (17,24).
Class B metallo-enzymes possess two binding sites for divalent Zn ions. The amide bond in the β-lactam ring is split through a nucleophilic attack on the carbonyl carbon atom of the β-lactam ring by the activated hydroxide Zn-1. This leads to the formation of an enzyme-substrate intermediate. The oxyanion, formed on the carbonyl oxygen of β-lactam, is stabilized by the Asn233 residue and Zn-1. Concurrently, Zn-2 interacts with the lone pair electron of the nitrogen atom of the β-lactam. The Asp120 residue accepts a proton from the activated water molecule within the enzyme and then transfers this proton to the nitrogen atom of an open β-lactam ring. This results in the release of the hydrolyzed substrate and the regeneration of the β-lactamase enzyme (12,35).
The MBLs of subclasses B1 and B3 have two binding sites for Zn ions (42). In the B1 subclass, the Zn-1 ion forms a tetrahedral coordination sphere that includes His116, His118, His196, and a water molecule. This water molecule also serves as a ligand for both Zn ions. The two binding sites are occupied by histidine and cystine. In the B1 enzyme, which includes BcII, VIM-2, and SPM-1, metal ions are found in the histidine binding site (43). In the B3 subclass, the Cys221 found at the Zn-2 site in the B1 subclass is replaced with a His ligand (42). Additionally, Zn-2 is ligated by Asp120, His121, His263, and nucleophilic water molecules, which form a bridge between the two Zn ions.
The GOB enzyme of the B3 subclass differs from other B3 enzymes due to point mutations that occur far from active sites, specifically Leu94Phe, Ala137Val, and Asp282Asn. Both B1 and B3 enzymes exhibit maximal activity when interacting with divalent Zn ion species. B2 enzymes, on the other hand, are non-competitively inhibited after binding to the Zn-2 ion, as histidine does not serve as the second metal-binding site. In the case of the B2 enzyme ImiS, the Zn-2 ion actively binds to the sulfur ligand formed from Met164 and His118. Cys221 is the only ligand of Zn-1, and a mutation of Met146 to Ile prevents inhibition by zinc. Other mutations in CphA residues do not interact with the Zn-2 ligand, as His118 and Met146 bind poorly to the same Zn ion (42-44). These conserved residues do not directly participate in catalysis. However, they play a crucial role in recognizing the substrate and maintaining the structure. Additionally, they actively engage in binding to Zn sites (45). The data suggests that the substitution of amino acid residues in CcrA, IMP-1, BcII, VIM-2, BlaB, and enzymes of the B3 subclass leads to the development of a mutation that confers resistance to carbapenems.
5. Clinical therapy and future approaches to curb the third and fourth generation β-lactam antibiotic resistance
Treatment of invasive bacterial infections is challenging, as most new drugs are not available in some countries and regions (46). Generally, strains that produce AmpC are resistant to multiple drugs, which complicates the selection of effective antimicrobial drugs. The combination of β-lactam and β-lactamase inhibitors, along with most cephalosporins and penicillin, should be avoided due to in vitro resistance. Carbapenems are the preferred drug for AmpC producers. A study conducted on a guinea pig model of pneumonia found that cefepime, imipenem, and meropenem are equally effective against porin-deficient FOX-5-producing K. pneumoniae strains. In a rat pneumonia model, β-lactams, such as imipenem, meropenem, ertapenem, or cefepime, yielded the same results against ACT-1 producing K. pneumoniae strains as they did in the guinea pig model. However, in a mouse model of pneumonia, cefepime showed superior results against K. pneumoniae strains (CMY-2) with porin deficiency. As a result, cefepime has been successful in treating infections caused by Enterobacter spp., including those with reduced susceptibility to ceftazidime (20).
In addition to the previously mentioned drugs, there are other classical and newer drugs that are active against AmpC producers in vitro. These include cephamycin and temocillin, which is a 6-α-methoxy derivative of ticarcillin. Other effective drugs include aminoglycosides, tigecycline, fosfomycin, and fluoroquinolones. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole is also used in the treatment of these infections. These drugs provide additional options for combating resistant bacterial strains (23). Additionally, amdinocillin, when combined with clavulanic acid, has been found to be effective against E. coli strains that produce AmpC in vitro (20). Gutmann et al. reported a new derivative of penicillinate YTR 830 that shows a similar spectrum activity as clavulanic acid combined with amoxicillin against Enterobacteriaceae (47). The MBL inhibitors, such as polymyxins, colistin, tigecycline, and fosfomycin, are effective against carbapenem-resistant E. coli and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infections in vitro. On the other hand, aminoglycosides, including gentamicin, amikacin, and tobramycin, exhibit a different spectrum of activity in vitro (47-49).
The Food and Drug Adminsitraton (FDA)-approved combination drug therapy, also known as fixed-dose combination therapy, is a novel approach aimed at curbing future bacterial resistance. Given the limited options for treating multi-drug resistant bacterial infections, combination therapy offers the best prospect for new drug discovery. The combination of antibiotics with non-antibiotic adjuvants and enhancers presents a promising and effective avenue for antibiotic discovery and development. In an era where the discovery and development of new antibiotics are at a historical low, revitalizing our existing drugs provides a fresh approach to prolonging the lifespan of our clinically approved drugs. Some FDA-approved combination therapies include Recarbrio (A combination of imipenem, cilastatin, and relebactam), Zerbaxa (Ceftolozane-tazobactam), and Avycaz (Ceftazidime-avibactam), all of which have proven effective in treating UTI. In situations where the infectious microorganisms are unknown and rapid treatment is urgently needed, the use of an appropriate dose of combined antibiotics is considered the best practice in the medical industry (50).
Conclusion
The accurate detection of AmpC and MBL production is critical in both hospital and community isolates. These strains are more prevalent than currently recognized strains and pose a significant threat to the efficacy of available beta-lactam drugs. The potential for outbreaks exists due to the selection pressure exerted by the extensive use of cephalosporins and carbapenem. Early identification of AmpC and MBL can aid in the establishment of a hospital-acquired infection control committee. This committee can guide physicians in prescribing the most suitable medications, such as FDA-approved combination drug therapy. This approach is one way to combat the growing resistance to antibacterial drugs. When the infectious microorganisms are unknown and immediate treatment is required, the use of an appropriate dose of combined antibiotics is a promising strategy in the medical industry.
Acknowledgement
This study did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Funding sources
No funding was granted for this study.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Author contributions
This article has one author.
Research Article: Review Article |
Subject:
Microbiology
Received: 2022/07/11 | Accepted: 2024/01/24 | Published: 2024/11/12 | ePublished: 2024/11/12
Received: 2022/07/11 | Accepted: 2024/01/24 | Published: 2024/11/12 | ePublished: 2024/11/12
References
1. Oberoi L, Singh N, Sharma P, Aggarwal A. ESBL, MBL and Ampc β lactamases producing superbugs - Havoc in the intensive care units of Punjab India. J. Clin. Diagnostic Res. 2013; 7(1): 70-73. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
2. Bush K, Bradford PA. Epidemiology of β-lactamase-producing pathogens. Clinical microbiology reviews. 2020; 33(2): 10-128. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
3. Buxeraud J, Faure S. Beta lactam antibiotics. Actual Pharm. 2016; 55(558s): 1-5. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
4. Kolhapure R, Kumar A, Rajkumar H. Coexpression of ESBL, Amp C and MBL in gram negative bacilli. Int. J. Res. Med. Sci. 2015; 3(10): 2698-2703. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
5. Rubee Chanu T, Shah PK, Soni S, Ghosh A. Phenotypic detection of extended spectrum, AmpC, Metallo beta-lactamases and their coexistence in clinical isolates of commonly isolated gram negativebacteria in GKGH hospital, Bhuj. IP Int J Med Microbiol Trop Dis. 2019; 5(1): 52-56. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
6. Karigoudar RM, Karigoudar MH, Wavare SM, Mangalgi SS. Detection of biofilm among uropathogenic Escherichia coli and its correlation with antibiotic resistance pattern. Journal of laboratory physicians. 2019; 11(01): 017-22. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
7. Nagarjuna D, Mittal G, Dhanda RS, Verma PK, Gaind R, Yadav M. Faecal Escherichia coli isolates show potential to cause endogenous infection in patients admitted to the ICU in a tertiary care hospital. New Microbes New Infect. 2015; 7: 57-66. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
8. Chakraborty A, Saralaya V, Adhikari P, Shenoy S, Baliga S, Hegde A. Characterization of Escherichia coli Phylogenetic Groups Associated with Extraintestinal Infections in South Indian Population. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2015; 5(4): 241-6. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
9. Tamang MD, Nam HM, Jang GC, Kim SR, Chae MH, Jung SC, et al. Molecular characterization of extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing and plasmid-mediated AmpC β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli isolated from stray dogs in South Korea. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012; 56(5): 2705-12. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
10. Tewari R, Mitra S, Ganaie F, Das S, Chakraborty A, Venugopal N, et al. Dissemination and characterisation of Escherichia coli producing extended-spectrum β-lactamases, AmpC β-lactamases and metallo-β-lactamases from livestock and poultry in Northeast India: A molecular surveillance approach. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2019; 17: 209-215. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
11. Tooke CL, Hinchliffe P, Bragginton EC, Colenso CK, Hirvonen VHA, Takebayashi Y, Spencer J. β-Lactamases and β-Lactamase Inhibitors in the 21st Century. J Mol Biol. 2019; 431(18): 3472-3500. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
12. El Shamy AA, Zakaria Z, Tolba MM, Salah Eldin N, Rabea AT, Tawfick MM, et al. AmpC β-Lactamase Variable Expression in Common Multidrug-Resistant Nosocomial Bacterial Pathogens from a Tertiary Hospital in Cairo, Egypt. Int J Microbiol. 2021; 2021: 6633888. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
13. Fisher JF, Meroueh SO, Mobashery S. Bacterial resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics: compelling opportunism, compelling opportunity. Chem Rev. 2005; 105(2): 395-424. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
14. Pfeifer Y, Cullik A, Witte W. Resistance to cephalosporins and carbapenems in Gram-negative bacterial pathogens. Int J Med Microbiol. 2010; 300(6): 371-9. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
15. Pitout JD, Sanders CC, Sanders WE Jr. Antimicrobial resistance with focus on beta-lactam resistance in gram-negative bacilli. Am J Med. 1997; 103(1): 51-9. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
16. Zmarlicka MT, Nailor MD, Nicolau DP. Impact of the New Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase on beta-lactam antibiotics. Infect Drug Resist. 2015; 8: 297-309. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
17. Yamasaki K, Komatsu M, Abe N, Fukuda S, Miyamoto Y, Higuchi T, et al. Laboratory surveillance for prospective plasmid-mediated AmpC beta-lactamases in the Kinki region of Japan. J Clin Microbiol. 2010; 48(9): 3267-73. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
18. Carcione D, Siracusa C, Sulejmani A, Leoni V, Intra J. Old and New Beta-Lactamase Inhibitors: Molecular Structure, Mechanism of Action, and Clinical Use. Antibiotics (Basel). 2021; 10(8): 995. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
19. Madec JY, Haenni M, Nordmann P, Poirel L. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase/AmpC- and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in animals: a threat for humans? Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017; 23(11): 826-833. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
20. Jacoby GA. AmpC beta-lactamases. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2009; 22(1): 161-82. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
21. Rodríguez-Guerrero E, Callejas-Rodelas JC, Navarro-Marí JM, Gutiérrez-Fernández J. Systematic Review of Plasmid AmpC Type Resistances in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae and Preliminary Proposal of a Simplified Screening Method for ampC. Microorganisms. 2022; 10(3): 611. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
22. Jacoby GA. Beta-lactamase nomenclature. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006; 50(4): 1123-9. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23. Helmy MM, Wasfi R. Phenotypic and molecular characterization of plasmid mediated AmpC β-lactamases among Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., and Proteus mirabilis isolated from urinary tract infections in Egyptian hospitals. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:171548. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
24. Kaur DC, Puri JS, Kulkarni SS, Jayawant A. Prevalence of AmpC Β-lactamases in clinical isolates of E. coli from a tertiary care rural hospital. Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2015; 7(6): 165-168. [Google Scholar]
25. Peleg AY, Franklin C, Bell JM, Spelman DW. Dissemination of the metallo-beta-lactamase gene blaIMP-4 among gram-negative pathogens in a clinical setting in Australia. Clin Infect Dis. 2005; 41(11): 1549-56. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
26. Labovská S. Pseudomonas aeruginosa as a Cause of Nosocomial Infections. InPseudomonas aeruginosa-Biofilm Formation, Infections and Treatments 2021. IntechOpen. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
27. Coll P, Pérez JL, Oliver A. Molecular epidemiology and mechanisms of carbapenem resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from Spanish hospitals. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007; 51(12): 4329-35. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
28. Miriagou V, Tzelepi E, Gianneli D, Tzouvelekis LS. Escherichia coli with a self-transferable, multiresistant plasmid coding for metallo-beta-lactamase VIM-1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003; 47(1): 395-7. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
29. Lincopan N, McCulloch JA, Reinert C, Cassettari VC, Gales AC, Mamizuka EM. First isolation of metallo-beta-lactamase-producing multiresistant Klebsiella pneumoniae from a patient in Brazil. J Clin Microbiol. 2005; 43(1): 516-9. [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
30. Lima LM, Silva BNMD, Barbosa G, Barreiro EJ. β-lactam antibiotics: An overview from a medicinal chemistry perspective. Eur J Med Chem. 2020; 208: 112829. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
31. Kong KF, Schneper L, Mathee K. Beta-lactam antibiotics: from antibiosis to resistance and bacteriology. APMIS. 2010; 118(1): 1-36. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
32. Balsalobre L, Blanco A, Alarcón T. Beta-lactams. Antibiot. Drug Resist. 2019; 57-72. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
33. Fratoni AJ, Nicolau DP, Kuti JL. A guide to therapeutic drug monitoring of β-lactam antibiotics. Pharmacotherapy. 2021; 41(2): 220-233. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
34. Neu HC. Relation of structural properties of beta-lactam antibiotics to antibacterial activity. Am J Med. 1985; 79(2A): 2-13. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
35. Garde S, Chodisetti PK, Reddy M. Peptidoglycan: structure, synthesis, and regulation. EcoSal Plus. 2021; 9(2). [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
36. Schriefer EM. Molekulare und biochemische Charakterisierung der β -Laktamasen von Yersinia enterocolitica und deren Sekretionsverhalten der Bayerischen Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg Eva-Maria Schriefer aus Coburg. 2012. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
37. Meini S, Tascini C, Cei M, Sozio E, Rossolini GM. AmpC β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales: what a clinician should know. Infection. 2019; 47(3): 363-375. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
38. Frye JG, Jackson CR. Genetic mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance identified in Salmonella enterica, Escherichia coli, and Enteroccocus spp. isolated from U.S. food animals. Front Microbiol. 2013; 4: 135. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
39. Corvec S, Caroff N, Espaze E, Marraillac J, Reynaud A. -11 Mutation in the ampC promoter increasing resistance to beta-lactams in a clinical Escherichia coli strain. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002; 46(10): 3265-7. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
40. Siu LK, Lu PL, Chen JY, Lin FM, Chang SC. High-level expression of ampC beta-lactamase due to insertion of nucleotides between -10 and -35 promoter sequences in Escherichia coli clinical isolates: cases not responsive to extended-spectrum-cephalosporin treatment. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003; 47(7): 2138-44. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
41. Mocktar C, Govinden U, Sturm AW, Essack S. The effect of mutations in the AmpC promoter region on β-lactam resistance from an Escherichia coli clinical isolate in a public sector hospital in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. African J. Biotechnol. 2008; 7(15): 2547-2550. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
42. Aitha M, Al-Adbul-Wahid S, Tierney DL, Crowder MW. Probing substrate binding to the metal binding sites in metallo-β-lactamase L1 during catalysis. Medchemcomm. 2016; 7(1): 194-201. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
43. Bebrone C. Metallo-beta-lactamases (classification, activity, genetic organization, structure, zinc coordination) and their superfamily. Biochem Pharmacol. 2007; 74(12): 1686-701. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
44. Fonseca F, Bromley EH, Saavedra MJ, Correia A, Spencer J. Crystal structure of Serratia fonticola Sfh-I: activation of the nucleophile in mono-zinc metallo-β-lactamases. J Mol Biol. 2011; 411(5): 951-9. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
45. Queenan AM, Bush K. Carbapenemases: the versatile beta-lactamases. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007; 20(3): 440-58, table of contents. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
46. Rodríguez-Baño J, Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez B, Machuca I, Pascual A. Treatment of Infections Caused by Extended-Spectrum-Beta-Lactamase-, AmpC-, and Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2018; 31(2):e00079-17. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
47. Gutmann L, Kitzis MD, Yamabe S, Acar JF. Comparative evaluation of a new beta-lactamase inhibitor, YTR 830, combined with different beta-lactam antibiotics against bacteria harboring known beta-lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986; 29(5): 955-7. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
48. Codjoe FS, Donkor ES. Carbapenem Resistance: A Review. Med Sci (Basel). 2017; 6(1): 1. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [PMID] [Google Scholar]
49. Peleg AY, Hooper DC. Hospital-acquired infections due to gram-negative bacteria. N Engl J Med. 2010; 362(19): 1804-13. [View at Publisher] [Google Scholar]
50. Malik MA, Wani MY, Hashmi AA. Combination therapy: Current status and future perspectives. Elsevier Inc. 2020; 1-38. [View at Publisher] [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Enamad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.